工作论文
当前位置:首页 > 工作论文
运用SES框架分析中国历史上以民间管理为主的灌溉系统
阅读全文         下载全文
TitleApplying a Social-Ecological System Framework to the Study of nine Community-based Irrigation Management Systems in Imperi  
作者樊果  
AuthorFan Guo  
作者单位中国社会科学院经济研究所 
OrganizationInstitute of Economics Chinese Academy of Social Sciences 
作者Emailfanguo@cass.org.cn 
中文关键词灌溉系统 民间管理 SES框架 前因条件组合 
Key WordsIrrigation system; community-based management; social-ecological system framework; combinations of causal conditions 
内容提要本文运用SES框架分析中国历史上以民间管理为主的九个灌溉系统。这些灌溉系统存在数百甚至上千年,有的更加成功,有的相对失败。研究表明,九个灌溉系统在治理体系、行动者和互动方面有相似之处,也有不同。灌溉规模、官府参与、水户异质性和民间力量在各系统间存在较为显著的差异。将这四个变量作为前因条件进行组合分析显示:单个条件均非实现灌溉系统长期存在或更加成功的必要条件,水户异质性显著是系统相对失败的必要条件;不同的条件组合可实现系统长期存在、更加成功或导致相对失败。 
AbstractThere were a lot of community-based irrigation management systems persisting for a long time in imperial China, which might have far-reaching effects on rural society. Scholars from diverse disciplines are interested in the impact of irrigation on communities, water culture, withdrawal right, conflict in using water and irrigation management. Some of them also investigate the origin and development of certain irrigation systems from historical records. CPR theory has been applied to current issues; however, it is seldom applied to historical ones. This paper applies a social-ecological system (SES) framework developed by Ostrom to the analysis of nine irrigation systems in Shanxi Province, Shaanxi Province and Anhui Province. Information regarding the nine systems is mainly based on five scholars’ literature. These nine systems persisted for at least several hundred years. The analysis of relevant second-tier variables indicates that there were similarities and differences in governance system, actor and interaction. There were no appreciable variation across different systems within the study in network structure (multi-level management and senior managers as a bridge between users and local government), property-rights system (users’ withdrawal right mostly depending on their investment on maintenance of physical infrastructure), operational rules, monitoring and sanctioning rules, channels of information sharing, type of conflicts, and investment activities. Collective-choice rules and constitutional-choice rules were actually absent. Users in each system were heavily dependent on irrigation water. The scale of irrigation system, the participation of local government, the heterogeneity of users and social power differed across the systems. In the light of distinction in accusations made by users among the nine cases some of systems seemed more successful than the others (more successful ones are denoted as outcome success and less successful as outcome failure).Take the four variables as causal conditions and persistence, success and failure as outcomes, and construct fuzzy sets . Run fsQCA3.0 software and the output illustrate individual conditions are not necessary for the persistence or success of irrigation systems, however, high-level heterogeneity of users is necessary for the failure. Different combinations of conditions are sufficient for persistence, success and failure. Four combinations will generate outcome persistence: (1) small-scale system, high-level heterogeneity of users and low-level participation of local government; (2) small-scale system, low-level heterogeneity and strong social power; (3) high-level heterogeneity, strong social power and low-level participation of local government; (4) high-level heterogeneity, large-scale system, weak social power and high-level participation of local government. High-level participation of local government did not equate to active intervention. It represented users’ dependence on government, especially the authority. The scale of irrigation system did not have a linear impact on the level of participation of local government and neither did heterogeneity of users. In eight systems either strong social power or high-level participation of local government existed or both. Two combinations will generate outcome success: (1) small-scale system, strong social power and low-level heterogeneity of users; (2) small-scale system, strong social power and low-level participation of local government. High-level heterogeneity of users, large-scale system and low-level participation of local government will generate outcome failure. Comparative case study analysis in this paper uses secondary data. Although the number of cases is small, the author faces similar challenges in constructing fuzzy sets as scholars conducting the large-N case study mete-analysis do. To improve the stability of membership score the author assign values to the five variables several times. However, the reproducibility and accuracy are note tested. With more information investigated, or further research relevant to the study conducted by other scholars, some of the membership score might need updating.  
文章编号WP1454 
登载时间2019-12-26 
  • 主管单位:中国社会科学院     主办单位:中国社会科学院经济研究所
  • 经济研究杂志社版权所有 未经允许 不得转载     京ICP备10211437号
  • 本网所登载文章仅代表作者观点 不代表本网观点或意见 常年法律顾问:陆康(重光律师事务所)
  • 国际标准刊号 ISSN 0577-9154      国内统一刊号 CN11-1081/F       国内邮发代号 2-251        国外代号 M16
  • 地址:北京市西城区阜外月坛北小街2号   100836
  • 电话/传真:010-68034153
  • 本刊微信公众号:erj_weixin