我国最低工资标准制定中的“攀比行为”
阅读全文
下载全文 |
| Title | The “comparison effect” of minimum wage adjustment in China
|
| 作者 | 杨灿 叶林祥 詹鹏 |
| Author | Yang Can,Ye Linxiang and Zhan Peng |
| 作者单位 | 北京师范大学；南京财经大学 |
| Organization | Beijing Normal University;Nanjing University of Finance and Economics |
| 作者Email | kawayican@sina.com；dashuihe@sina.com；zp01@xiaowanxue.com |
| 中文关键词 | 最低工资标准 面板logit模型 攀比行为 |
| Key Words | Minimum Wage; Logit Model; Comparison Effect |
| 内容提要 | 本文利用2004-2013年31个省市相关数据对各地最低工资标准调整进行实证分析。研究发现，各地在进行最低工资标准调整时，没有充分考虑到当地失业率、人均消费水平和人均GDP等因素，受其他地区最低工资标准调整情况的影响，存在“攀比行为”，并且这种“攀比”是基于经济发展水平上的，受发达地区调整情况的影响较大；另一方面，由于《最低工资规定》要求各地最低工资标准至少两年调整一次，前一年调整过最低工资的地区在下一年调整的概率较低。各地政府这种“攀比行为”会导致最低工资标准制定过高，可能会对就业造成伤害，这与最低工资制度的初衷相违背。各地最低工资政策要取得预期的效果，并不是简单地跟风调整，而应当考虑当地实际情况，并加强与之相配套的劳动力市场法规的落实、执行和监管。 |
| Abstract | In this paper, we use the minimum wages and relevent data of 31 provinces about 2004~2013 to conduct empirical analysis. On the one hand,we find that there is “comparison effect” in minimum wage adjustments in China. When the province decides to adjust the minimum wage, it’s influenced by other regions, especially influenced by the developed province, does not fully take into account the local unemployment rate, per capita consumption , per capita GDP and other factors. On the other hand, due to the “rule of minimum wage” requires once adjustment at least two years, the country has to adjust the minimum wage if it didn’t adjust before. These will lead to the higher level of the minimum wage, which may harm employment, contrary to the original intention of the minimum wage system. Only combine the actual local situation, strengthen the implementation and supervision of labor market regulations, can the minimum wage policy to achieve the desired results. |
| 文章编号 | WP1029 |
| 登载时间 | 2016-02-05 |
|