分租、让租与行业收入差距 阅读全文
下载全文 |
Title | Interpreting Inner Industry Income Gap with Rent Sharing and Rent Remising
|
作者 | 周云波 武鹏 沈扬扬 |
Author | Zhou Yunbo, Wu Peng and Shen Yangyang |
作者单位 | 南开大学经济学院;中国社会科学院经济研究所 |
Organization | School of Economics of Nankai University; Institute of Economics, CASS |
作者Email | zyunbonk@163.com;wuzuopeng831228@163.com;shenyangyang428@hotmail.com |
中文关键词 | 行业收入差距 效率工资 分租 让租 面板误差修正 |
Key Words | Inner industry income gap; Efficiency wage; Rent sharing; Rent remising; Panel data error correction |
内容提要 | 在梳理关于行业收入差距既有研究文献的基础上,本文提出了“让租”的概念,并指出垄断只是行业收入差距形成的间接原因,垄断租金产生后企业的“分租和让租”行为才是造成行业收入差距的根本原因。基于中国工业行业样本的误差修正模型估计结果表明,我国工业企业中确实存在“分租与让租”行为,即劳动报酬的提高确实会促使劳动者更为努力地工作以创造更多的利润,进而促进行业利润率的提升;反过来当行业可分配收益增多时,企业便倾向于更多地给付劳动报酬。定量分析显示,“分租”所带来的有效率但不公平的行业收入差距占现有差距水平的45.0%,“让租”所带来的行业收入差距占现有差距水平的70.8%,剔除对效率的考虑后,让租所带来的纯粹的不公平的行业收入差距占现有差距水平的25.8%。分租和让租现象的存在抑制了考察期内我国行业收入差距下降的速度。 |
Abstract | Based on review of the literature of inner industry income gap, this paper note that the key interpreted this issue is study on rent sharing and rent remising. The estimated result of error correction model based on the sample of China’s Industrial sectors show that: increase of labor remuneration will indeed make the labor to work harder for creating more profit and then advance the industry profit margin; when the distributable earnings of an industry increase, firm in this industry prone to pay more labor remuneration. The inner industry income gap brought by rent sharing makes 45.0% of the existing inner industry income gap, which is efficient but unfair. The inner industry income gap brought by rent remising makes 70.8% of the existing inner industry income gap. Then without considering efficiency, the pure unfair part of the gap brought by rent remising makes 25.8% of the existing inner industry income gap. The existence of rent sharing and rent remising has restrained the decline rate of inner industry income gap in the researching period. |
文章编号 | WP464 |
登载时间 | 2013-06-07 |
|